|
DMPS Chelation VS Metal Free
Mercury and heavy metals are shown to come out of the body using Metal Free. Heavy metals are measured before Metal Free and right after Metal Free. You probably need to take Metal Free for a year to fully rid yourself of heavy metals.
Laboratory tests completed on three levels: Level I (In Vitro) was an examination of the Metal Free peptide's ability to fully bind the heavy metal vs. DMPS and DMSA chelation. The active ingredients bound 100% of the mercury versus the DMPS and DMSA chelation binding only 40%. Level II, tested the product's efficacy in mice and rats. The active ingredients in Metal-Free completely cleared mercury poisoning levels within 4 doses (according to animal's weight) as compared to DMPS or DMSA chelation reducing heavy metals by only 2%. Level 3, Human Testing: in ongoing testing of individuals with stool excretion between 10 -100 PPM, individuals are showing a broad spectrum of heavy metals being eliminated from the stool during the use of Metal-Free for heavy metal detox without undue patient discomfort. Increases, over pre-levels, in the amount of several hundred percent per heavy metal, are not uncommon with certain heavy metals.
Clinical evidence and patient response are fully consistent and provide evidence that Metal-Free formula can greatly shorten a patient's heavy metal detoxification period.
Heavy Metal Detox - Note Other Heavy metals detox before toxic element Mercury.
|
In Minkoff, MD’s patient experience using Metal-Free as part of a mercury detoxification protocol, the period of time required for program completion has been 30-50% faster than without using Metal-Free. This translates to a smoother and faster reduction.
These are four patients using Metal-Free. A heavy metal detox is suggested in these particular four patients taking Metal-Free Natural. Stool heavy metal analysis used in detox was done BEFORE using Metal-Free Natural. Then stool heavy metal analysis used in detox was done AFTER using Metal-Free. This would imply that Metal-Free was pulling out heavy metals using through the liver, and then excreted by the intestine and the stool for these four patients. This may or may not indicate a heavy metal detox from heavy metal toxicity. The toxic element mercury is also shown to increase in the stool right after the patient was given Metal-Free. This would imply that Metal-Free Natural increased heavy metal detoxification for this patient.
Large increase in natural mercury detoxification is seen in Patient #2 with Metal Free.
|
Notice that many different heavy metals are in line for detoxification. Some of these heavy metals may have to be pulled out before the toxic element mercury can be pulled out. This is most evident in Patient #4. Right after the first dose of Metal-Free Natural heavy metals are measured in the stool. There is some mercury detox. However, after 10 weeks of continuously using Metal-Free Natural another stool sample was taken. Much more mercury detoxification is shown. This is an example of Metal-Free Natural going after one heavy metal pulling it out first. Then after exhausting that heavy metal toxicity, finally detoxification of mercury may be accomplished. Metal-Free Natural will generally bind metals in a priority on their descending molecular weight: uranium, lead, thallium, and then mercury. This will also depend on the amount of available heavy metal poisoning present and its location.
Patient #3 sees very large increase in natural Mercury detoxification.
|
Similar patterns of heavy metal detoxification for heavy metal poisoning is seen with DMPS, DMSA, and EDTA chelation. Before mercury detoxification for heavy metal poisoning, other heavy metal toxicity is eliminated first. DMPS, DMSA, and EDTA chelation must pull out other heavy metals before pulling out mercury poisoning.
“For many toxic element (s) such as mercury poisoning, cadmium, lead, antimony and uranium, biliary excretion into the feces is the primary natural route of elimination from the body. … fecal element analysis also provides a direct indication of dietary exposure to heavy metal toxicity.”
Patient #4 shows a classic heavy metal detox, then after 10 weeks of Metal Free, a very large natural mercury detox occurs.
|
A quote from Doctor’s Data, Inc. : Analysis of elements in feces provides a comprehensive evaluation of environmental exposure, accumulation and endogenous detoxification of potentially toxic heavy metals. For several toxic element (s) such as mercury, cadmium, lead, antimony, and uranium, biliary excretion of heavy metals into feces in a detox is the primary natural route of elimination from the body. Studies performed at DDI demonstrate that the fecal mercury content and number of mercury amalgam surfaces is highly correlated, as is the case for post DMPS urine mercury levels and mercury amalgam surface area. Results are reported as mg/kg dry weight of feces to eliminate the influence of variability in water content of fecal specimens. The reference values that appear in this report have been derived from both published data and in-house studies at DDI. * Due to exposure to the heavy metal in the oral cavity, people with dental mercury filling amalgams typically have a considerably higher level of toxic element mercury in the feces than individuals without dental amalgams; therefore, two reference ranges have been established for the toxic element mercury. To provide guidance in interpretation of results, patient values are plotted graphically with respect to percentile distribution of the population base. Since this test reflects both biliary excretion and exposure (toxicity to heavy metals to which the patient is exposed may not be absorbed), it may not correlate with overt clinical effects. Further testing can assist in determining whether the heavy metals are from endogenous (biliary excretion) or exogenous oral sources.
- Bjorkman, L, Sandborgh-England, G, and Ekstand, J, [ toxic element ] Mercury in Saliva and Feces after Removal of Amalgam Fillings. Toxicology & Applied Pharmacology 144: 156-162 (1997)
- Zalups, R, Progressive Losses of Renal Mass and the Renal and Hepatic Disposition of Administered Inorganic [ toxic element ] Mercury. Toxicology & Applied Pharmacology 130: 121-131 (1995)
- Adamsson, E., Piscator, M., and Nogawa, K. , Pulmonary and Gastrointestinal Exposure to Cadmium Oxide Dust in a Battery Factory. Environmental Health Perspectives, 28: 219-222 (1979)
- Smith, J. et al., The Kinetics of Intravenously Administered Methyl [ toxic element ] Mercury in Man. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 128: 251-256 (1994)
- Bass, D., et al., “Measurement of [ toxic element ] Mercury in Feces”, Poster Presentation 1999 AACC
Patient Data
Heavy Metals in mg/kg of dried stool.
| |
Patient #1
|
|
|
|
Patient #2 |
|
| |
BEFORE |
AFTER |
|
|
BEFORE |
AFTER |
| Mercury |
0.092 |
0.2 |
|
|
0.046 |
0.144 |
| Antimony |
0.01 |
0.065 |
|
|
0.069 |
0.107 |
| Arsenic |
.1 |
1.38 |
|
|
0.26 |
1 |
| Beryllium |
none |
0.005 |
|
|
0.005 |
none |
| Bismuth |
0.023 |
0.024 |
|
|
0.473 |
1.666 |
| Cadmium |
0.13 |
0.49 |
|
|
0.34 |
0.47 |
| Copper |
34 |
42 |
|
|
79 |
82 |
| Lead |
0.12 |
0.39 |
|
|
0.14 |
0.15 |
| Nickel |
3.9 |
5.4 |
|
|
11.1 |
10.6 |
| Thallium |
0.017 |
0.015 |
|
|
0.019 |
0.016 |
| Tungsten |
0.0008 |
0.218 |
|
|
0.033 |
0.44 |
| Uranium |
0.012 |
0.09 |
|
|
0.131 |
0.42 |
| |
Patient #3
|
|
|
Patient #4 |
|
| |
BEFORE |
AFTER |
|
BEFORE |
AFTER |
AFTER 10 WKS |
| Mercury |
0.19 |
0.207 |
|
0.014 |
0.026 |
0.086 |
| Antimony |
0.057 |
0.059 |
|
0.069 |
0.134 |
0.055 |
| Arsenic |
.24 |
0.42 |
|
0.26 |
0.45 |
0.26 |
| Beryllium |
none |
0.011 |
|
0 |
0.0004 |
0.0004 |
| Bismuth |
none |
0.026 |
|
0.088 |
0.086 |
0.006 |
| Cadmium |
0.5 |
0.32 |
|
0.71 |
1.09 |
0.55 |
| Copper |
92 |
29 |
|
50 |
90 |
76 |
| Lead |
0.37 |
0.67 |
|
0.34 |
0.63 |
0.24 |
| Nickel |
14.5 |
29.1 |
|
6 |
10.3 |
5.2 |
| Thallium |
0.01 |
0.009 |
|
0.007 |
0.016 |
0.008 |
| Tungsten |
0.051 |
0.065 |
|
0.115 |
0.21 |
0.048 |
| Uranium |
0.163 |
0.136 |
|
0.031 |
0.033 |
0.132 |
|
|
